471 reactions to: www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-05-07-clintoninterview_N.htm
’s no point in Israel trying to negotiate with any of the Arab states, either. How about a president that converted from Christianity to Islam, Herr Luttwak? Would that be okay? Of course, then “hard-working Americans, white Americans” might have a problem voting for him (or her), but what the hell, it’s all in the name of world peace and assassination avoidance, right? I can’t believe the New York Times would publish such an obvious piece of race baiting garbage on their op
’s no point in Israel trying to negotiate with any of the Arab states, either. How about a president that converted from Christianity to Islam, Herr Luttwak? Would that be okay? Of course, then “hard-working Americans, white Americans” might have a problem voting for him (or her), but what the hell, it’s all in the name of world peace and assassination avoidance, right? I can’t believe the New York Times would publish such an obvious piece of race baiting garbage on their op
In an interview with USA Today that is already becoming one of the day's hot items, Hillary Clinton told the paper that she has "a much broader base to build a winning coalition on" than Barack Obama does. And she referred to an Associated Press article that, she
did not want its surrogates to pressure Clinton into a decision before she is ready. So in repayment for this gesture, Clinton went out on the campaign trail and started the race-baiting once again. Clinton said in an interview with USA Today: “I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on,” she said in an interview with USA TODAY. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article “that found how Sen. Obama’s support among working, hard-working Americans, white
What are you saying either in terms of your verbalizations, gestures and thoughts towards others? As I referenced before, I’m just a Black guy, but I’m just as hard-working as any other hue found in America and the world. A Few References: http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-05-07-clintoninterview_N.htm http://online.wsj.com/public/article/declarations.html http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080511/OPINION/805110317 http://blackstarnews.com/?c=125&a=4531
yelled out a common racial slur for African Americans, according to Obama campaign staffers. What is especially sickening about this is the extent to which the Clinton campaign has encouraged this through their surrogates and via Senator Clinton’s most recent comments on the matter: “I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on,” she said in an interview with USA TODAY. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article “that found how Sen. Obama
full voice to all the whispery insinuations Clinton keeps making in justifying her continued run. With her smiling, soothing "My supporters are racist" talking point, Poehler translated into plain English the coded message Clinton herself sent in an interview with USA Today last week: "Senator Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again ..." I question the non-Poehler Clinton on two points: 1) Whether any meaningful fraction of
Some of us were taken aback by the implications of Hillary Clinton's comments during a recent USA TODAY interview where she cited evidence that ["Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states (Indiana and North Carolina) who had not completed college were supporting her.
USA TODAY
"I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on... Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again... There's a pattern emerging here." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton, in an interview with USA Today I have a theory. In mid-January, shortly before the South Carolina primary, when Hillary started alienating black voters with her comments about how Dr.